Cases 21 - 30 of 33
HALE V. SUPERINTENDENT ET AL.
as 1:2014cv00286
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HALE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALE v. SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2014cv00284
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HALE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2014cv00287
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HALE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. The GEO Group, et al
as 13-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., N.M. CORRS. DEP'T, ISSAC GUERRA and others
Sparks v. Hale
as 5:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Theodore Sparks
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hale
as 5:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
Dempsey Smith
Defendant:
Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Vigil et al
as 1:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hale
Defendant:
J Vigil , FNU Eastridge , FNU Archuleta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Michael Hale, Swanson Service Corporation, Katrina Ross and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00494
Petitioner:
Jay F Vann
Respondent:
Michael Hale, Randy Christian and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vann v. Ross et al
as 2:2012cv00497
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Katrina Ross, Anne Marie Adams, Cindy Collins and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
