Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M. Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Herman Quay, Paul Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hall v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv01224
Petitioner:
Michael Hall
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, B. RUDZIENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodland v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2019cv02025
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Rodland
Defendant:
Michael Hall and Nadine Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JEFFREY WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03452
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. HALL et al
as 2:2011cv01023
Petitioner:
KEVIN KING
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA , MICHAEL HALL and ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. DIVERSIFIED ADJUSTMENT SERVICE, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv06975
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
DIVERSIFIED ADJUSTMENT SERVICE, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HALL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68445
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
