Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LAMBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12463
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J LAMBERT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 23-1481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT ARBOGAST and BRENT ANDREW BRACKETT ARBOGAST
Defendant / Appellee:
PFIZER, INC., SHEEHAN, PHINNEY, BASS & GREEN PA, JOHN J. BRACK and others
Arbogast v. Pfizer et al
as 1:2022cv10156
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Arbogast and Pro se Litigant Brent A. Arbogast
Defendant:
Pfizer, Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green, P.A., John J. Brack and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Butler v. Lambert et al
as 1:2020cv11840
Defendant:
David McGrath and Michael J. Lambert
Plaintiff:
David J. Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Danny Popov, et al v. Nuvasive, Inc., et al
as 17-80055
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DANNY POPOV, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated and BRAD MAUSS, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
NUVASIVE, INC., ALEXIS V. LUKIANOV and MICHAEL J. LAMBERT
Mauss v. Nuvasive, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02005
Plaintiff:
Danny Popov
Defendant:
Nuvasive, Inc., Alexis V. Lukianov, Kevin C. O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System v. Vincent C Smith et al
as 8:2007cv00901
Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Vincent C Smith, Douglas F Garn, Michael J Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
