Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Reverend Beck v. William Barr, et al
as 24-1144
Plaintiff:
Reverend Beck, Phd
Defendant:
William P. Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Beck v. Barr et al
as 0:2023cv03863
Plaintiff:
Reverend Doctor Beck
Defendant:
William Pelham Barr, John G. Roberts, Lavenski R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
Hunter v. Murdoch et al
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant:
William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Richmond v. Brooklyn Center PD et al
as 4:2015cv04050
Plaintiff:
Courtney Richmond
Defendant:
Brooklyn Center PD, Hennepin County Jail, Hennepin County Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al, The et al
as 0:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Paul Campbell
Defendant:
Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al, The, Richard Stanek, Brady Sweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Hennepin County Court et al
as 0:2012cv03089
Plaintiff:
Jill Clark , Jill Clark, LLC , Jill Clark, P.A. and others
Defendant:
Hennepin County Court , Minnesota Court of Appeals, the , Minnesota Supreme Court, the and others
Joeffre Kolosky, et al v. Honorable Michael J. Davi
as 12-2033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joeffre Kolosky
Defendant - Appellee:
Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, acting in official capacity as a Judge
Movant - Appellee:
Lee A. Lastovich, Huyen Le Phan and Gregg Marlowe Corwin
Kolosky v. Davis
as 0:2011cv03648
Plaintiff:
Joeffre Kolosky
Defendant:
Michael J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
