Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Beck v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5042
Defendant / Appellee:
Erica H. Macdonald, United States District Attorney, James A. Crowell, IV, Director/Executive Officer/United States Attorney, John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Beck, Reverend Doctor, PhD
Schell v. Gurich, et al
as 20-6044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. FIELDS, member, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors, JUSTICE JAMES E. EDMONDSON, Associate Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, JOHN MORRIS WILLIAMS, Executive Director, Oklahoma Bar Association and Secretary/Treasurer, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK E. SCHELL
Richard Bell v. Michael Davis, et al
as 20-35065
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, an individual, AKA James Michael Davis, BIGADO NETWORKS INCORPORATED, an Oregon corporation, MJ CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., an Oregon corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD BELL, an individual
Hunter v. Murdoch et al
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant:
William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America et al v. Tom S Chang et al
as 2:2013cv03772
Defendant:
Brett Braun, California Eye and Ear Specialists, Tom S Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Susan C Rogers, Bobbette A Smith, The State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Davis, et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase &
as 6:2001cv06492
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Davis , Elena Lombardo , Carol . Smith and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Michael J. Davis v. A-bex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-73477
Defendant:
A-bex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
