Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roosevelt Mackey, Jr. v. Michael Lamm
as 12-6075
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT MACKEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. LAMM
Respondent:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the North Carolina Dept. of Correction and ALVIN WILLIAM KELLER, JR.
Anthony Leon Hoover v. Robert Lewis et al
as 10-7376
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prisons, MICHAEL J. LAMM, Superintendent, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATION and others
Washington v. Keller et al
as 5:2010ct03143
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lawrence Washington
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller, Robert C Lewis, Michael J. Lamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Hoover v. Michael Lamm
as 10-6682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. LAMM, Superintendent, ANTHONY HALFWAY, Superintendent, RICK JACKSON, Superintendent and others
Anthony Hoover v. Michael Lamm
as 10-6677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. LAMM, Superintendent, TAMMY BRYANT, RICHARD BROADWELL, MD and others
FRANKLIN-EL v. LAMM
as 1:2010cv00183
Petitioner:
STANLEY EUGENE FRANKLIN-EL
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. LAMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOVER v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2010cv00129
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Respondent:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, MICHAEL J. LAMM, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Miller v. Michael Lamm
as 08-6317
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD A. MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. LAMM
Moses v. Ham et al
as 5:2007ct03082
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Moses
Defendant:
Robert Ham, Belinda Dudley, Michael A. Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Lamm
as 5:2007hc02008
Petitioner:
Oneeze Odessa Brooks
Respondent:
Michael J. Lamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
