Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Robb v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 3:2024cv02885
Plaintiff:
Michael James Robb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Williamson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael James Williamson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DiFranco v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael James DiFranco
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael James Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GRASMEDER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04511
Plaintiff:
Michael James Grasmeder
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Michael James Patterson v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
Michael James Patterson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Michael James Pratt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
(SS) Sakane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Michael James Sakane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Michael Richter v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-2392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael James Richter
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
