Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Revere v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00875
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Revere
Defendant:
Wanda Robinson, Donte Gordon, Donnie Bethel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head v. Albright
as 1:2014cv03987
Plaintiff:
Michael James Head
Defendant:
Michael Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head v. Medical Care Provider et al
as 1:2014cv03988
Plaintiff:
Michael James Head
Defendant:
Medical Care Provider, Smith, Medical Staff Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael James Baker
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Christopher Gordy, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael James Craig
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Ossie Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petsoules v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00133
Petitioner:
Michael James Petsoules
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petsoules v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00097
Petitioner:
Michael James Petsoules
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. BARROW
as 3:2014cv00004
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES TURNER
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. BARROW
as 5:2014cv00001
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES TURNER
Respondent:
DONALD BARROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01463
Petitioner:
Michael James Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
