Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Craig v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
Michael James Craig
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Ossie Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Brown et al
as 5:2012cv00355
Plaintiff:
Michael James Butler
Defendant:
Shirley Brown, Stacy L. George, Michelle R. Bishop and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv08023
Petitioner:
Michael James Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dixon v. Correctional Medical Services (INMATE1)
as 3:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
Michael James Dixon
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulson et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michael James Paulson , Rhonda Paulson , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00452
Petitioner:
Michael James Hubbard
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. McClenny et al
as 3:2009cv00935
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and others
Defendant:
John McClenny, Kim McClenny and The Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael James Delph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Banks v. James et al
as 1:2009cv00561
Plaintiff:
Shera Banks
Defendant:
Michael James and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
