Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Dawson et al v. Commonwealth Recycled Aggregates, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
Edward Dawson , Paul Martin , Paul Myers and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth Recycled Aggregates, Inc., B & S Site Development, Inc. and Michael L. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SURGICK v. HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL BANK et al
as 2:2012cv07198
Plaintiff:
ZEFFIE N. SURGICK
Defendant:
HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL BANK, HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY, HARLEYSVILLE GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. Michael L. Brown
as 12-3606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BROWN
Christopher Fenelus v. David Varnes, et al
as 12-14110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER FENELUS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R. VARNES, MICHAEL L. BROWN, ERIC A. JACKSON and others
Fenelus v. Varnes et al
as 3:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fenelus
Defendant:
David R. Varnes, Michael L. Brown, Eric A. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fifth Third Bank v. Lake Olivia, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Lake Olivia, LLC , Michael L. Brown , Derek Anderson, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Falcon Transport Company
as 4:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Brown
Defendant:
Falcon Transport Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Brown v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 11-1580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TIMOTHY R. DESHERLIA, RANDALL P. SHROYER and others
Michael Brown v. DOJ
as 10-5356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael L. Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
BROWN v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2010cv01753
Petitioner:
MICHAEL L. BROWN
Respondent:
GUY PIERCE, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, MICHAEL WALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
