Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Daniels v. County of Oakland et al
as 2:2021cv12303
Plaintiff:
Gayle Daniels
Defendant:
County of Oakland, Dayna DeMeester, Joshua Wurfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANCASTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41738
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANCASTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANCASTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24087
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANCASTER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANCASTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03373
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANCASTER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANCASTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv46829
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANCASTER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANCASTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10734
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANCASTER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ukena v. Steines et al
as 3:2020cv50026
Defendant:
Jane, Stanley B. Steines, James D. Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Ukena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Michael Lancaster v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 19-72101
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANCASTER
LANCASTER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11075
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LANCASTER , ESTATE OF HOLLI LANCASTER , JEFFREY LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Lancaster v. People of California
as 2:2015cv05496
Petitioner:
Michael Lancaster
Respondent:
People of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
