Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Lawrence v. General Electric International, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Defendant:
General Electric International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(SS) Lawrence v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael Lawrence v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv08254
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Dept., Deputy Machado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In the Matter of Michael Lawrence Connell - SBN 164648
as 3:2019mc80236
Respondent:
Michael Lawrence Connell
Damon Williams v. PRK Funding Services, Inc., et al
as 19-35746
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, RICHARD BESELIN, RONALD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS
Bowen v. The City of Oakland et al
as 4:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Libby Schaaf, Dept. of Public Works, Joe Devries and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowen and Michael Lawrence Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon Williams v. PRK Funding Services, Inc., et al
as 19-35120
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, RICHARD BESELIN, RONALD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS
Lawrence v. F/V Rennel Sound et al
as 3:2018cv05621
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Defendant:
Vernon Soeneke and F/V Rennel Sound
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Williams v PRK Funding Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Williams
Defendant:
PRK Funding Services Inc, King County, Jeffrey Pyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
