Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Journey v. Ricketts et al
as 8:2020cv00040
Respondent:
Tom Barr, John H. Marsh, Richard Beecher and others
Petitioner:
Ricky G. Journey
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Journey v. Nebraska Mental Health Board et al
as 8:2019cv00089
Respondent:
Buffalo County Mental Health Board, Agnes Stairs, Stephen Lowe and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General and Buffalo County Attorney
Petitioner:
Ricky G. Journey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Journey v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Nebraska Mental Health Board, Cathy Sheair, Richard Beecher and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Journey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WILES et al
as 3:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
DEMETRICE MICHAEL LAWSON
Defendant:
A WILES and OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ephrain v. Gossett et al
as 3:2015cv03359
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ephrain
Defendant:
Greg Gossett, Zach Roeckeman, Rick Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Box v. Troy Steele, et al
as 14-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith D. Box
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy Steele, Warden, Unknown Comer, Correctional Officer, Unknown White, Captain and others
Box v. Steele et al
as 4:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Box
Defendant:
Troy Steele, Unknown Comer, Unknown White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Newell et al
as 3:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Michael Lawson
Defendant:
Donald Newell and WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Newell et al
as 1:2013cv01562
Plaintiff:
Demetrice Michael Lawson
Defendant:
Donald Newell and Walton County Jail
Smith v. Bennett
as 2:2012cv00163
Petitioner:
Rodney Theopitulus Smith
Respondent:
Wayne Bennett and Michael Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
