Cases 31 - 40 of 47
JOHNSON v. YOHN et al
as 2:2012cv04526
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. YOHN, ROBERT B. KUGLER, MICHAEL M. BAYLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALIKKAHN v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE et al
as 2:2012cv04289
Plaintiff:
ASSABUR MALIKKAHN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, FAFSA, UNITED STATES MARSHAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Richard Corbin
as 12-2582
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD CORBIN
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M BAYLSON
MALIK-KHAN v. BAYLSON
as 2:2012cv01825
Plaintiff:
AS SABUR MALIK-KHAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Scott Travaline, et al
as 11-3232
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: SCOTT JOHN TRAVALINE
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LUCINDA ELIZABETH TRAVALINE and SETH FRANCIS TRAVALINE
Defendant - Respondent:
US SUPREME CT
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M BAYLSON
In Re: Ossie Trader
as 11-2470
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: OSSIE R. TRADER
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M BAYLSON
In Re: Richard Corbin
as 11-2463
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: RICHARD CORBIN, also known as RASHEED also known as SHEED also known as RICHARD RASHEED CORBIN
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M BAYLSON
In re: Ossie Trader
as 11-1026
Petitioner:
In re: OSSIE R. TRADER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M BAYLSON
TRADER v. S. et al
as 2:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Defendant:
R. S., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, OFFICE OF THE CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Jay Berger
as 10-4153
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAY BERGER
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M BAYLSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
