Cases 71 - 80 of 399
Farez-Espinoza v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv11060
Petitioner:
Maria Augusta Farez-Espinoza
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Farez-Espinoza v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv11060
Petitioner:
Maria Augusta Farez-Espinoza
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIERRE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06286
Petitioner:
NORKENS PIERRE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Farez-Espinoza v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv11060
Petitioner:
Maria Augusta Farez-Espinoza
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abpikar v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2008cv05661
Petitioner:
Hassan Abpikar
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Robin F. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lyles v. Lemmons, et al
as 08-31208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv07222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Doye v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv03408
Plaintiff:
Irvin Sylvester Doye
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of Attorney General, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jomat Gary Ermando v. Michael Mukasey
as 2:2008cv08290
Petitioner:
Jomat Gary Ermando
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BARKER v. MUKASEY et al
as 3:2008cv06174
Petitioner:
ASHTON BARKER
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DETENTION AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS and EDMOND C. CICCHI
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
