Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GONDOR v. CHITWOOD et al
as 2:2019cv05768
Plaintiff:
JOHN GONDOR
Defendant:
RICHARD HOWELL, MICHAEL CHITWOOD, DANIEL OLIVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONDOR v. BENNETT et al
as 2:2019cv05428
Defendant:
RYAN BENNER, MICHAEL MURPHY, UNKNOWN SUPERVISER OF ROBERT BENNET - UDPD and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. GONDOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cessna v. Lewis et al
as 3:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Cessna
Defendant:
Robin M. Lewis, Wayne J. Gavin, Ronda Ellett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. COOPER et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE W. FRAZIER
Defendant:
WILLIAM COOPER, S.L. NOLAN, MICHAEL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Cooper et al
as 3:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Johnnie W Frazier
Defendant:
William Cooper, S.L. Nolan, Michael Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sosa v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2012cv01724
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sosa
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA, Joseph Girillo, Jody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. HOLMES et al
as 3:2012cv03188
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MURPHY
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and PAULA T. DOW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Marcel Farrish
as 11-2045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCEL RAYNARD FARRISH, a/k/a Marcel Raynard Farris a/k/a Michael Murphy
McCLAIN v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2008cv01810
Petitioner:
THOMAS DARRELL McCLAIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL MURPHY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McClain v. Murphy
as 3:2008cv00625
Petitioner:
Thomas Darrell McClain
Respondent:
Michael Murphy, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and The District Attorney of the County of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
