Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Murphy v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00637
Petitioner:
Kevin Michael Murphy
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Murphy v. G. Matteson
as 2:2022cv02092
Petitioner:
Michael Murphy
Respondent:
G. Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Arnold
as 2:2015cv02321
Petitioner:
Michael Murphy
Respondent:
Eric Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDonald v. Murphy
as 13-8086
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MURPHY, Warden, Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp
Tucker v. Murphy, et al
as 12-8073
Petitioner - Appellant:
IRA TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MURPHY, Warden, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WYOMING
Peterson v. Lampert et al
as 1:2012cv00167
Respondent:
Robert Lampert, Daniel Shannon, Eddie Wilson and others
Petitioner:
Martin James Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MURPHY v. HOLMES et al
as 3:2012cv03188
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MURPHY
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and PAULA T. DOW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Lampert, et al
as 12-8032
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN JAMES PETERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, MICHAEL MURPHY, Wyoming Department of Corrections Warden, GABRIEL RAMIREZ, Wyoming Department of Corrections Sergeant and others
Peterson v. Lampert et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
Martin James Peterson
Defendant:
Robert O Lampert, Michael Murphy, Gabriel Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tucker v. Murphy, et al
as 11-8086
Petitioner - Appellant:
IRA TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MURPHY, Warden, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and ATTORNEY GENERAL, State of Wyoming
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.