Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FLYNN v. RAINS et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Defendant:
HARLEY CRABB, BRETT DIERDORF, TONY KEITH and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEST v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv01688
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. BEST
Defendant:
LENA BURROWS, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEST v. INDIANA STATE FARM et al
as 2:2016cv00091
Petitioner:
ALVIN MARK BEST
Respondent:
INDIANA STATE FARM, MICHAEL RAINS and BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HATCHER v. WYNN et al
as 2:2012cv00197
Defendant:
MRS. BYRER, MR. HARTSOCK, MICHAEL RAINS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER v. BYRERS et al
as 2:2012cv00183
Defendant:
Mrs. BYRERS, MICHAEL RAINS, RECORDS OFFICE SUPERVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS vs. KIDDER et al.
as 1:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
JAMAINE D BROOKS
Defendant:
HARTLEY, JOHN DOES/JANE DOES, MICHAEL KIDDER and others
Miscellaneou:
OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Kidder et al
as 1:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jamaine D Brooks
Defendant:
Michael Kidder, W C Peterson, Terry Silvers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01009
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, CAPTAIN ROBERT BEAUTRY, JACK BINION and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
