Cases 61 - 70 of 774
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY KING
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michael Ray Bredemier v. Theresa Cisneros
as 5:2022cv02016
Appellant:
Michael Ray Bredemier
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchem v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00449
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Mitchem
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ray et al v. Conservice, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray, Britni Georgianna and Roes 1 through 100, inclusive
Defendant:
Conservice, LLC and Does 1 through 10,000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
USA v. Michael Alford
as 22-13767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY ALFORD
Allen v. Perkins et al
as 5:2022cv05199
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrol Officer Perkins and Rogers Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ray Pitre v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv07956
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Pitre
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ABLES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21245
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY ABLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CROWSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20995
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY CROWSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
