Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Luis Contreras v. City of Nogales, et al
as 22-16860
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUIS E. CONTRERAS
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF NOGALES, ANDRES PALAFOX, Officer, in his official and individual capacities and MARTIN QUEZADA, Officer, in his official and individual capacities
Defendant:
HCH TUCSON HOLDINGS LLC, doing business as Carondelet Holy Cross Hospital and JOHN MICHAEL REID
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mayes et al v. The United States of America
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mayes and Lucille Lagasse
Interested Party:
Harry Michael Reid
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Michael Reid Lewis v. Transunion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00531
Plaintiff:
Michael Reid Lewis
Defendant:
Transunion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael B. Reid
as 3:2017ad00155
In Re:
Michael Reid
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Michael Reid Tunick
as 3:2016ad00070
In Re:
Michael Reid Tunick
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Lindstrom v. Moffett Properties
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
Thorin John Lindstrom and Kristin Kathleen Lindstrom
Defendant:
Moffett Properties, William B. Moffett, Michael Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
D.R. et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00591
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation, Pfizer Inc and others
Plaintiff:
D. R., Heidi Reid and Michael Reid
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
