Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Cox v. Cox
as 6:2023cv01744
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Cox
Defendant:
Cassondra Nichole Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quezada v. Moreno et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Saxon, Unknown Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quezada v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv01969
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeffery Middleton, Jr. and Phoenix Police Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Quezada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quezada v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv01968
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jeri Williams, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Quezada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quezada v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv01788
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, C Moreno, K Saxon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Quezada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Robert Blackburn v. Craig Koenig
as 5:2019cv01340
Respondent:
Craig Koenig
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Roberts v. Ryan
as 2:2019cv03399
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services Incorporated, John Modrzewski, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00331
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Haynes
Respondent:
Colette Peters and Jerri Taylor
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen and Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Persky v. USA
as 16-35804
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROBERT PERSKY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Haynes v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Supervision et al
as 2:2016cv00128
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Haynes
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Supervision, Colette Peters and Jeri Taylor
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen, Lynn David Larsen and Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
