Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
Feather-Gorbey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Kentucky, Governor and Attorney General, State of Virgina, Governor and Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Morris
as 21-7684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. PHILLIPS, FCI Beckley, MORRIS, Unit Counselor, SWAGGER, Commissary Supervisor and others
Defendant:
PINE A LOWER EVENING UNIT LADY STAFF, PINE A COUNSELOR, POPLAR B LOWER COUNSELOR and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. US
as 21-6858
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Michael Gorbey v. Lt. Brown
as 21-6848
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER SMITH, Unit Manager Poplar Unit, LIEUTENANT MANNING, FCI Beckley, VEST, FCI Beckley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 21-6820
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. BARNETT, FCI Estill S.C., MS. ULMER, FCI Estill S.C., MASTRO, FCI Estill S.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01602
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
