Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Waller et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv04148
Plaintiff:
Dalisha Waller and De'Zavion Waller
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Melissa Massman, Deanna Duff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Afiz v. Missouri Department of Correction et al
as 3:2026cv00661
Petitioner:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Miron Taylor
Respondent:
Missouri Department of Correction, Michael Shewmaker, South Central Correction Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hopkins v. Shewmaker
as 4:2026cv00915
Petitioner:
Noah Hopkins
Respondent:
Michael Shewmaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Shewmaker
as 6:2026cv03333
Petitioner:
Richard Romel Taylor
Defendant:
Michael Shewmaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eliseo Hernandez-Sebastian v. Michael Shewmaker
as 26-2156
Petitioner:
Eliseo Hernandez-Sebastian
Respondent:
Michael Shewmaker
Hopkins v. Shewmaker
as 6:2026cv03326
Petitioner:
Noah Hopkins
Respondent:
Michael Shewmaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Chada et al
as 6:2026cv03296
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashokkumar Chada, Michael Shewmaker and Centurion Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Afiz v. Shewmaker
as 4:2026cv00741
Petitioner:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Miron Taylor
Respondent:
Michael Shewmaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Afiz v. Shewmaker
as 6:2026cv03266
Petitioner:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Miron Taylor
Respondent:
Michael Shewmaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. Shewmaker
as 4:2026cv00867
Petitioner:
DeAndre D Walton
Respondent:
Michael Shewmaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
