Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Armendariz Perez v. Warden Mr. Smith
as 4:2023cv01168
Petitioner: Irene Armendariz Perez
Respondent: Warden Mr. Smith and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lundahl v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner: Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent: Merrick Garland, Collette Peters, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Smith
as 23-11013
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Michael Smith, also known as Florida, also known as Big Mike
Poff v. Smith
as 23-10981
Petitioner / Appellant: Julia Ann Poff
Respondent / Appellee: Warden Michael Smith
Poff v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00870
Petitioner: Julia Ann Poff
Respondent: Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Forth Worth Police Department
as 4:2023cv00861
Petitioner: Michael Smith
Defendant: M. Skelton
Respondent: Fort Worth Police Department and Fort Worth Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Girven v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00859
Petitioner: Rita M. Girven
Respondent: Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Poff v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00621
Plaintiff: Julia Ann Poff, Holli Telford Lundahl and Cheryl Steward
Defendant: Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00632
Plaintiff: Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant: Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?