Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Poff v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Poff
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Captain FNU Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalez
as 4:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. P & B Intermodal Services LLC
as 3:2020cv03618
Defendant:
P & B Intermodal Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith, Michael Steven Smith, Wayne Boyd and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. USA
as 4:2020cv00849
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hanon v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv00533
Defendant:
ATH Recovery LLC doing business as Majestic Recovery and Jon Michael Smith doing business as Panola Auto Sales
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Hanon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TCSS Environmental Technologies LLC v. Cavortex Technology International LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02754
Claimant:
TCSS ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
Raymond Michael SMITH and Cavortex Technology International LLC
Respondent:
CAVORTEX INTERNATIONAL LLC
Plaintiff:
TCSS Environmental Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Smith v. McGuire
as 4:2019cv00914
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Brett McGuire, Kristie Burnett and Michael Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McClendon
as 4:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Smith
Defendant:
Eddie McClendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Locket et al
as 4:2019cv00626
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Smith
Defendant:
Sargent Locket, Chief Sullivan and Officer Stine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McGuire
as 4:2019cv00628
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Smith
Respondent:
Sheriff Brett McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
