Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Smith v. Roedding et al
as 3:2013cv02633
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gordon Lou Roedding and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYREK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05910
Plaintiff:
JOHN SYREK , GREGORY ADAMS , SHIRLEY MCCOY and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TARANGO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05822
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TARANGO , GREGORY ADAMS , MARY BARKSDALE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. CHURNEY et al
as 2:2013cv01202
Plaintiff:
FUQUAN Y. HILL
Defendant:
CHURNEY, HUDOCK, F. NUNEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITEHEAD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
KHALEAH WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , RYAN P. POWNALL , MICHAEL SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Grainey et al
as 3:2012cv02470
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley
Defendant:
David Grainey, Michael Smith, Mark Cappoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Duran et al
as 1:2012cv02398
Petitioner:
Dennis Michael Smith
Respondent:
Thomas V. Duran and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAY v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant:
JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 2:2011cv01379
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 5:2011cv45816
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
