Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barrales et al v. Ghost Beverages LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Tinamarie Barrales and Michael Williams
Defendant:
Ghost Beverages LLC and Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In Re: Rymer
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Michael William Rymer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Michael Williams v. Dylon Radtke
as 23-3268
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
DYLON RADTKE
Ladewig v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Michael William Ladewig
Defendant:
Amanda Perez, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Bryan Royce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harber et al v. Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Joshua Harber, Nicholas Irvin, Stephen Looney and others
Defendant:
Landmark Recovery of Carmel LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SJC Coroner Patricia Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Michael Brown v. Kamry Palmer, et al
as 23-2559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMRY PALMER and AUSTIN PECARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Petitioner:
SoundThinking, Inc.
Hill v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv04079
Plaintiff:
Demeco Hill
Defendant:
Michael Williams, Tyrone Baker, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
