Cases 11 - 20 of 32
MERILIEN v. SINGLETON et al
as 5:2019cv00124
Defendant:
WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON, CAMPBELL, DOCTOR LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
Deputy Warden ANTHONY TERRELL, Officer CHENNELL SIMMS and Warden STANLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledford v. Sellers
as 4:2017cv00211
Petitioner:
Michael William Ledford
Respondent:
Eric Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE ANTONIO WALKER
Defendant:
STANLEY WILLIAMS, MICHAEL WILLIAMS, TALETHIA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gilmer County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Michael William Jones
Defendant:
Stacey Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2015cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PAT JOHNSON and WALTER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Townsend Tree Service Company LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Joey D. King , Jathan D. King , Junior Carter and others
Defendant:
Townsend Tree Service Company LLC and Michael Williams
Patterson v. Morris et al
as 1:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
Anita Patterson
Defendant:
Michael William Morris and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Fayette County Government et al
as 3:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Fayette County Government, Sheriff Wayne Hannah and Deputy Alfred Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWANN v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
STACEY LEE SWANN, DANIEL YOUNG, Michael Williams and others
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, WILLIAM POWELL, VICTORIA MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
