Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Koch v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv05853
Petitioner:
Michael William Koch
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Degon v. Williams
as 2:2022cv00142
Counter Defendant:
Daniel Degon
Counter Claimant:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Williams et al v. OPVHHJV LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Defendant:
David Wood, John and Jane Does 1-100, OPVHHJV LLC Property Manager Landlord doing business as Pathlight Property Management and others
Plaintiff:
Nikki Simon, Michael Williams and Scott Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams et al v. Harrington et al
as 2:2021cv00143
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-100, City College of San Francisco and Timothy Patrick Harrington
Plaintiff:
CSG WA LLC and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv01701
Defendant:
Darlene Brown, Brown J Construction Inc, Joseph Brown and others
Plaintiff:
CSG WA LLC and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Williams et al v. Mian et al
as 2:2020cv01702
Plaintiff:
CSG WA LLC and Michael Williams
Defendant:
Umar Mian, Osman Mian and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dunn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05137
Plaintiff:
Michael William Dunn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Williams v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05659
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Koch v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv05193
Petitioner:
Michael William Koch
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Koch v. United States
as 3:2016cv05063
Plaintiff:
Michael William Koch
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
