Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Koch v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00226
Petitioner:
Michael William Koch
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Williams v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 16-1056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2015cv06505
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Koch v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01761
Plaintiff:
Michael William Koch
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Andrew Edilinger and Danielle Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POLES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv03649
Plaintiff:
DONALD POLES , DANTE JONES , ANTHONY MCGILL and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, ROBERT BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Inflection Energy, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Inflection Energy, LLC , U.S. Well Services, LLC and U.S. Well Services, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
U.S. Well Services, LLC
Cross_defendant:
Inflection Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORDON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
KEITH ANDRE GORDON
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, CAROL WILLIAMS, DANIEL DUTCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koch v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2014cv01832
Petitioner:
Michael William Koch
Respondent:
Ebbert and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv05212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
