Cases 41 - 50 of 67
WILLIAMS v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2013cv07468
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Koch v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv02704
Petitioner:
Michael William Koch
Respondent:
J. Thomas and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARITAS HEALTH CARE, INC. v. MICHAEL WILLIAMS CONSULTING LLC
as 3:2013mc00017
Plaintiff:
CARITAS HEALTH CARE, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS CONSULTING LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv05119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON'S MAILROOM
as 5:2013cv04927
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON'S MAILROOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Michael William
as 13-2934
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
WILLIAMS et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2013cv02098
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE WILLIAMS and MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2013cv00237
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN DELANEY and SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Fenstermaker et al
as 1:2012cv02383
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v ZIMMER, INC., ET AL
as 2:2012cv05712
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS and VALORIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS,INC. and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
