Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Stanley Constantino, et al v. Michigan Department of State P, et al
as 11-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY CONSTANTINO, GAIL JONES, RICHARD KONKEL and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTIE K. ETUE, Col., Michigan State Police Director
Solomon v. Wayne County Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv12330
Plaintiff:
Martin Solomon
Defendant:
Wayne County Corporation, Bode Technology Incorporated, Jacquelyn Stasiak and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hays #63336 v. Johnston et al
as 1:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rebel Hays #63336
Defendant:
Heather Johnston, Steve Miller, A. Steensma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Michael Gresham v. MDOC, et al
as 09-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GRESHAM, State/Federal Government Informant Agent (Certified) Legal Assistant Human Right Activist Suing in Capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, MUNISING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniel #537193 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00160
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Office of Administrative Hearings, Jeri-Ann Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. MI St Police Dept
as 06-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT, named as Michigan Department of State Police
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
