Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Route Guidance Systems LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2022cv02278
Plaintiff:
ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS LLC
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
PFINGSTON v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
HAROLD PFINGSTON
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and GOOGLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. SOLUTION HAT, LLC D/B/A THINK GLOBAL et al
as 1:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
SOLUTION HAT, LLC D/B/A THINK GLOBAL and SAURABH SETH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Think Products, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2021cv06757
Plaintiff:
THINK PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Khader v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04632
Plaintiff:
Khaja M M Khader
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Microsoft, Facebook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alloyed Enterprises Co. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2021cv04468
Plaintiff:
Alloyed Enterprises Co.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, RCN Telecom Services LLC and Comcast Corporation of the Dept. of Homeland Security
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Thomas Madison Glimp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kashkeesh v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2021cv03229
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Pena, Emad Kashkeesh, Beau Zanca and others
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01109
Defendant:
Xbox Game Studios and Microsoft Corporation
Reynolds v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01110
Plaintiff:
Paige Reynolds
Defendant:
Xbox Game Studios and Microsoft Corporation
Kyle et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2021cv00743
Petitioner:
Jo Ann Treumann and Robert Kyle
Respondent:
Microsoft Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
