Cases 1 - 10 of 30
City of Quincy, MA, et al v. FERC
as 22-1201
Petitioner:
QUINCY, MA, BRAINTREE, MA and FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS)
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Interested Party:
SANDRA PETERS, REBECCA HAUGH, GARY PETERS and others
Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. Robin Jones Logging et al
as 4:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Bituminous Casualty Corporation
Defendant:
Robin Jones Logging, Richard Reeves, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Apache Corporation v. FERC
as 09-1204
Petitioner:
Apache Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Enogex LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC
Midcontinent Express Pipeline L L C v. Land Madison Parish
as 3:2008cv01160
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Land Madison Parish, Willie Bigham Unopened Succession, Irene Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the West Half (W/2) of Section 34, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M. and the Northwest Quarter (NW/4) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00299
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in the West Half (W/2) of Section 34, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M. and the Northwest Quarter (NW/4) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma and Riverbend Ranch, LP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the North Half (N/2) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma
as 6:2008cv00293
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in the North Half (N/2) of Section 3, T-8-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma and Foster OK Resources L.P. of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in Southwest Quarter (SW/4) aka Lot 7, of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 6, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00295
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in Southwest Quarter (SW/4) aka Lot 7, of the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 6, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma, Rickey Hugh Raney, Johnny Life Raney, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. A strip of land located in the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 17, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00294
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
A strip of land located in the Southwest Quarter (SW/4) of Section 17, T-7-S, R-13-E, I.M., Bryan County, Oklahoma, Brad Raney and Farm Service Administration, United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 1.2 Acres In Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00373
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant:
1.2 Acres In Hinds County, Mississippi, Barry G. Brunson, 2.03 Acres in Hinds, County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 2.1 Acres Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00354
Plaintiff:
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant:
2.1 Acres Hinds County, Mississippi, Wesley J. Wilson and Unknown Persons Having Interest In Said Property
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
