Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Lush, Stephen v. Burns, Lorie et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Lorie Burns, Middleton Police Department, Steven Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Lush v. Lawrence Bechler, et al
as 23-2666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE E. BECHLER, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHELLE SCHWARTZ and others
Lush, Stephen v. Bechler, Lawrence et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Lawrence Edgar Bechler, Middleton Police Department, Michelle C. Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Lush, II v. Scott Moen, et al
as 23-1846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. LUSH, II
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MOEN, Lieutenant, CITY OF MIDDLETON, CITY OF MIDDLETON, for the Middleton Police Department and others
Negley v. North Middleton Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah J. Negley
Defendant:
North Middleton Police Department and Blake Conrad Bilbrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Possibly Canyon County Sherriffs, Brian Crawforth, Bailey Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2020cv00122
Respondent:
Canyon County and Middleton Police Department
Petitioner:
Cameron Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Middleton Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Cameron Morris
Defendant:
Canyon County, Middleton Police Department, Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
