Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Miguel Angel Garcia v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2017cv05357
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Garcia
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce
Miguel Angel Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv03189
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Finance of America Reverse, LLC v. Garcia Lopez et al
as 3:2016cv03201
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse, LLC
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Garcia Lopez, Carmen Luisa Hernandez Reyes, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finance Of America Reverse Llc v. Garcia-Lopez et al
as 3:2016cv01990
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse, LLC
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Garcia-Lopez, Carmen Luisa Hernandez-Reyes, Conjugal Partnership Garcia-Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09862
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Miguel Garcia-Sanchez
as 15-40804
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA-SANCHEZ, also known as Miguel Arreola Sanchez, also known as Manuel Benites Arreola
Miguel Angel Garcia v. Top Rank Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01456
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garcia
Defendant:
Top Rank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
US v. Martinez
as 14-1584
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ, a/k/a Miguel Pache-Pache, a/k/a Miguel Pache, a/k/a Alejandro UNK, a/k/a Miguel Martinez-Martinez, a/k/a Javier Francisco Ortiz, a/k/a Miguel Angel Garcia, a/k/a Francisco Javier Felix, a/k/a Miguel Angel Martinez
Miguel Angel Garcia v. Top Rank Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00928
Defendant:
Does and Top Rank Inc
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garcia
Jose Garcia Perez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70890
Petitioner:
JOSE MIGUEL GARCIA PEREZ, AKA Jose Garcia, AKA Miguel Angel Garcia
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
