Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Sanchez la Torre, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2106
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ LA TORRE, YAQUELINE KRISTIMEN LIZA ALVAREZ, SABRINA AKIRA YACKELIN SANCHEZ LIZA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Sanchez-Delgado
as 23-10322
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Angel Sanchez-Delgado, also known as Miguel Angel Sanchez Delgado, also known as Miguel Delgado-Sanchez, Miguel Angel Sanchez
USA v. Sanchez-Delgado
as 23-10304
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Angel Sanchez-Delgado
Sanchez v. Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08065
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Sanchez
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc.,, Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miguel Sanchez-Medina v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3898
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Miguel Angel Sanchez v. A. Robles et al
as 2:2022cv07723
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Sanchez
Defendant:
A. Robles, M. Reyes, E. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Laredo Sportswear, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Ramos
Defendant:
Laredo Sportswear, LLC and Miguel Angel Sanchez Jr
Miguel Sanchez-Hernandez v. William Barr
as 20-72008
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ, AKA Miguel Angel Sanchez-Hernande
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
US v. Perez Soto
as 20-1018
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
VALENTIN DELO PEREZ SOTO, a/k/a Miguel Martinez, a/k/a Miguelin Valentine Sanchez, a/k/a Harold Gutierrez, a/k/a Miguel Angel Sanchez Caraballo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
