Cases 11 - 20 of 21
GIDDENS v. BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2019cv00140
Defendant:
Officer BROWN, Captain TERRY GRIFFIN, BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. CHAPMAN et al
as 7:2019cv00137
Defendant:
BILLY INGRAM, TRACY CHAPMAN and MIKE DEWEY
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MASK v. DEWEY et al
as 7:2018cv00183
Defendant:
Deputy THOMAS FRYE, TROUPVILLE WRECKER SERVICE, Sheriff MIKE DEWEY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT IVAN MASK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
as 7:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL et al v. DEWEY et al
as 7:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILL and VIRGIE HILL
Defendant:
MIKE DEWEY, JERRY MILLER, TERRY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS et al v. BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
SYDARIUS REYNOLDS and VERDA MAE REYNOLDS
Defendant:
BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE SELLARS, TERRY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Giddens, et al v. Hugh Lawson, et al
as 17-10169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge, W. LOUIS SANDS, Senior District Judge, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, Magistrate Judge and others
MCLEOD v. INGRAM et al
as 7:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BILLY INGRAM , BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA , MYRA EXAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BROOKS COUNTY JAIL
as 7:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
DECAMARON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MIKE DEWEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
