Cases 1 - 7 of 7
James Owens v. Stephen Duncan, et al
as 18-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN DUNCAN, Warden, in his individual capacity, JOHN COE, M.D. Medical Director, CLAUDIA DOWTY, LPN and others
Edwards et al v. Mansfield, City of et al
as 1:2015cv00959
Defendant:
City of Mansfield and Lori A Cope
Plaintiff:
Alan Edwards , Andrew Boor , Angie Eichinger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Arlington Properties, Inc. et al v. Hope International Ministries, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02972
Plaintiff:
Arlington Properties, Inc. and Glenmont Arlington Citrus Park, LLC
Defendant:
Hope International Ministries, Inc., Jerold Farrington, Mike Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan et al v. Higgins & Associates Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv11301
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan , Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Plan , Operating Engineers Local 324 Retiree Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Higgins & Associates Inc. and Mike Higgins
FTC v. Trudeau, et al
as 1:2003cv03904
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Kevin Trudeau, Shop America (USA), LLC, Robert Barefoot and others
Respondent:
The Law Offices of Marc J. Lane PC, Winston & Strawn LLP, Marc J. Lane and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Petitioner:
Nataliya Babenko, GIN USA, Inc., KT Radio Network, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Perry Kiraly, Lisa Bergamin, Yon Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff:
Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant:
United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
