Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Nguyen, et al. v. City of Garden Grove, et al.
as 24-189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON NGUYEN, NGOC LE THI PHAN and HOANG MINH NGUYEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, MARK LORD, MICHAEL REYNOLDS and others
Wilson v. Mike & Martin's Asphalt, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Megan Wilson
Defendant:
Mike & Martin's Asphalt, LLC and Kaleb Shayne Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15660
Plaintiff:
MIKE MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Conn et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Toby Ray James
Defendant:
Brad Conn, Heather Patterson and Mike Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Mike & Martin's Asphalt, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Megan Wilson
Defendant:
Mike & Martin's Asphalt, LLC and Kaleb Shayne Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
DeGruy v. Martin
as 6:2022cv01362
Plaintiff:
Omari Lateef DeGruy
Defendant:
Mike Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeGruy v. Martin et al
as 6:2022cv01347
Plaintiff:
Omari Lateef DeGruy
Defendant:
Mike Martin, Tammi Huber and Steve D. Marick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bastian v. Rivera et al
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Thomas O. Bastian
Defendant:
Krystal Rivera, New Mexico Corrections Department, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Nguyen v. City of Garden Grove et al
as 8:2021cv01775
Plaintiff:
Aaron Nguyen
Defendant:
City of Garden Grove, Mark Lord, Michael Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Independent Service Provider, LLC v. Martin
as 8:2021cv00746
Defendant:
Mike Martin
Plaintiff:
Independent Service Provider, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
