Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 248
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Mills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11332
Petitioner: MICHAEL ROGER MILLS
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mills v. Clay County Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Wallace Mills
Defendant: Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills, Wallace v. Clay County Courts et al
as 1:2024cv21635
Plaintiff: Wallace Mills
Defendant: Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff: Jamie Mills
Defendant: John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv00630
Petitioner: Jimmy David Mills
Respondent: Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodas v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: Ronald Rodas
Defendant: Clayton County, Georgia, Levon Allen, Victor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Ocala Police Department
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Kenneth Antwion Mills
Defendant: Ocala Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. BRANCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00468
Plaintiff: DUANE WOULLARD
Defendant: BRANCH, NAFINA LANGLEY, A ACOSTA-MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13299
Petitioner / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?