Cases 11 - 20 of 283
Mills v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04551
Petitioner:
James Addison Mills
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. Mills
as 2:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Waylon Bowen
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lincoln v. Fiebig et al
as 1:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Jason Wayne Lincoln
Defendant:
FNU Fiebig, Dan Mills, Kim Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ditto v. Mills
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Larry Dale Ditto
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
Ronald King, Warden Jackson, Warden Vigliate and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Aransas County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert Ernest Moreno
Defendant:
Bill Mills, Aransas County Sheriff's Department, Chief Deputy Michael Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fermin v. Charles Schwab et al
as 4:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Santos Fermin
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, Tides of Randol Mill and DNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hattenbach v. City Of Rockport et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
James Robert Hattenbach
Respondent:
City Of Rockport, Aransas County, Sheriff Bill Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris
as 23-60348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Doran Maurice Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Harris, Sheriff Randall Tucker, Madison County, Mississippi and others
Mills v. Tidwell et al
as 5:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jerry J. Mills
Defendant:
Judge Tidwell and Bart C Craytor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
