Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv11700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26209
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ekeh v. Grunder et al
as 6:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ekeh
Defendant:
Brian Grunder, (fnu) Bogo, Jan Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finnerty v. Baily et al
as 1:2026cv03293
Plaintiff:
Alex C Finnerty
Defendant:
Willem Baily, Kolacz Arkadivszk, Milo Handy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Montelongo (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2026cv03451
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Montelongo
Defendant:
Amie Jane Johnson, Milo Quintana and Rebecca Sheagley Montez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. 789123, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02221
Plaintiff:
John Sosa
Defendant:
789123, Inc. doing business as Estiatorio Milos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Montelongo (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2026cv02959
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Montelongo
Defendant:
Amie Jane Johnson, Milo Quintana, Gina Maria Simonson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Curiel-Rosas v. 789123, Inc.
as 2:2026cv01783
Plaintiff:
Gylma Curiel-Rosas
Defendant:
789123, Inc. doing business as Estiatorio Milos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
