Cases 21 - 30 of 30
MILTON v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2013cv00219
Petitioner:
CLEATUS T. MILTON
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NANCE v. MARIANA
as 3:2012cv00140
Petitioner:
MILTON R. NANCE
Respondent:
MARIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Montalvo v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2011cv00162
Petitioner:
Milton Montalvo
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel , Louis S. Folino , Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHABAZZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv02328
Petitioner:
MILTON SHABAZZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Milton v. Graterford et al
as 1:2009cv01477
Petitioner:
Glenn D. Milton
Respondent:
Graterford and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kapa v. Palakovich, et al
as 1:2009cv00371
Plaintiff:
Joseph Milton Kapa
Defendant:
John A. Palakovich, Paul K. Smeal, Greenleaf and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Day v. Holt
as 4:2009cv00007
Petitioner:
Milton Day
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JONATHAN LEE RICHES v. SCARFO et al
as 2:2007cv04149
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
NICODEMO S. SCARFO, JOSEPH MERLINO, MILTON MILAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv03974
Petitioner:
MILTON SIMON WASHINGTON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARR v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2007cv02793
Plaintiff:
JAMAL BARR
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, SHARON BURKS, MICHAEL J. MCGOVERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
