Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Bethea et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2014cv60291
Petitioner:
James Bethea , Charles F. Forgar , Linda T. Belcher-Commisso and others
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Milton Tucker v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 14-15129
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILTON LEE TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Milton Tarver v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-20816
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILTON LEE TARVER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Tarver v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv03286
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tarver v. Thaler
as 3:2012cv00306
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01912
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tucker
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tucker v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01909
Petitioner:
Milton Lee Tucker
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Milton Vandevort
as 11-50454
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MILTON LEE VANDEVORT, AKA Lee Vandevort, AKA Leland W. Vandevort
Lee v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2011cv03167
Petitioner:
Milton Lee
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Chris Biggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CROCHET et al v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60186
Plaintiff:
MILTON LEE CROCHET and GEORGIA H. CROCHET
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, CO. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
