Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv04009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Andrews v. Minnehaha County Jail et al
as 4:2014cv04006
Plaintiff:
Jerrin James Andrews
Defendant:
Minnehaha County Jail and Detective Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeNoyer v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2013cv03200
Plaintiff:
Dale E. DeNoyer
Defendant:
Minnehaha County - SD, State of Missouri, State of Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Karr et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC (CCS) et al
as 4:2013cv04132
Plaintiff:
Bethany Karr
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC (CCS) , Amanda Sturgeon , Sarah Molloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Correctional Care Solution et al
as 4:2013cv04124
Plaintiff:
Terrance Terrell Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Correctional Care Solution, Minnehaha County Jail, Susan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. Minnehaha County Jail
as 4:2013cv04116
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jensen
Defendant:
Minnehaha County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassen v. Minnehaha County Jail
as 4:2013cv04110
Plaintiff:
Abdi Hassen
Defendant:
Minnehaha County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Eden et al
as 4:2012cv04151
Plaintiff:
Roberto Lazzu Rivera
Defendant:
Amanda Eden, J. Matthews, Warden Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Rindahl v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 12-1505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant - Appellee:
Dennis Daugaard, Governor, State of South Dakota, Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, Aaron McGowan, State Attorney, Minnehaha County and others
Hicks v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 4:2011cv04096
Plaintiff:
LaPete R. Hicks, Sr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Minnehaha County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
