Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Minor #1 through John Doe #1 et al v. Sand Castle Caterers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02391
Plaintiff:
MINOR #1 JOHN DOE, MINOR #2 JOHN DOE #2 and MINOR #3 JANE DOE
Defendant:
SAND CASTLE CATERERS, INC., ENRIQUE SANCHEZ and NICHOLAOS BOULTADAKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jessica Dominguez, et al v. Michael Pina, et al
as 23-15562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA DOMINGUEZ, individually and Jessica Dominguez as Guardian Ad Litem for J.D. , Minor # 1; Jo. D., Minor # 2; Ja. D., Minor # 3, J. D., Minor #1, JO. D., Minor #2 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PINA, Police Officer, CITY OF SAN JOSE and SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Jessica Dominguez v. J. D., et al
as 23-15554
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JESSICA DOMINGUEZ, individually and Jessica Dominguez as Guardian Ad Litem for J.D. , Minor # 1; Jo. D., Minor # 2; Ja. D., Minor # 3, J. D., Minor #1, JO. D., Minor #2 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PINA, Police Officer
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN JOSE and SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Gentry et al v. Hammond Police Dept. et al
as 2:2019cv00482
Plaintiff:
Minor #2, Minor #1 and Brandon Joseph Gentry
Defendant:
Hammond Police Dept. and Lake County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case et al v. The Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2008cv00811
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Case, Minor #1 and Minor #2
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, The County of Fairfax, Virginia, Michael Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Case et al v. The Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2008cv00810
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Paoli Case, Minor #1, Valerie Martin and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, The County of Fairfax, Virginia, Michael Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
