Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Minton et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00706
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Minton and Jane Minton
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Minton v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq03496
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Minton
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
London v. Minton
as 3:2022cv03034
Plaintiff:
Steven London
Defendant:
Debra Minton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minton v. Hto et al
as 4:2019cv00059
Defendant:
RTS Holdings LLC, Brett T OLeary, VIP Carriers Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael G Minton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Minton v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2018cv01354
Plaintiff:
John M Minton
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MINTON v. SPEEDWAY, LLC
as 1:2018cv02032
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY, LLC
Plaintiff:
DALLAS MINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Quinn v. Apostol et al
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey O'Quinn
Defendant:
Louis Apostol, Bruce Rauner, Jennifer Gomric-Minton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Floyd County, Indiana, et al v. Tabitha Gentry, et al
as 16-8014
Petitioner:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS, Individually and in his capacity as Floyd County Sheriff, TIFFANY FRANS, Individually and others
Respondent:
TABITHA GENTRY, VINCENT MINTON, MICHAEL HERRON and others
MINTON v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2016cv01932
Defendant:
AARON BROOKS, ROBERT BROOKS, HENSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY PHILLIP MINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minton v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07446
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson Minton
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
