Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Open Entry Services, et al. v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-2202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OPEN ENTRY SERVICES, a prepositional service provider of the United States and BRITTIAN WILLIE YOUNG, SR., Prepositional Negotiator for O.E.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, a territory of the U.S., UNKNOWN PARTY, named as ADEQ in original complaint, as state entity administrator, UNKNOWN PARTY 2, named as ADOCS in original complaint, as state entity administrator and others
Young et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Brittian Willie Young, Sr. and Open Entry Services
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Party, Misael Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 2:2022cv01368
Plaintiff:
Brittian Willie Young and Open Entry Services
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CABRERA RUIZ v. ATLAS PILES, LLC. et al
as 1:2021cv24050
Plaintiff:
MISAEL CABRERA RUIZ
Defendant:
ATLAS PILES, LLC., HAMMER TIME BUILDERS INC.,, CARBAJAL INVESTMENTS 1, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Dlubak Glass Company v. Cabrera et al
as 2:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Misael Cabrera, Bradley Baker and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Dlubak Glass Company a Pennsylvania corporation and Dlubak Glass Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabrera Ruiz v. United States Of America
as 1:2017cv24291
Plaintiff:
Misael Cabrera Ruiz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cabrera v. Union Oil Company of California
as 2:2016cv00441
Plaintiff:
Misael Cabrera
Defendant:
Union Oil Company of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Cabrera v. SCI Arizona Funeral Services Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00156
Defendant:
SCI Arizona Funeral Services Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Misael Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
