Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Anthony WilliamsIn re: Anthony Williams
as 23-3037
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KYLE RUSSELL, DEPUTY STEVEN MILLER, Warden of Treatment, DEPUTY ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2022cv03532
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROBERTSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, U.S. POSTAL INSPECTOR, AL HERZOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian Dior WomackIn re: Christian Dior Womack
as 21-1357
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK
Mark WoodsIn re: Mark Woods
as 21-1136
Respondent:
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: MARK WOODS
Christian WomackIn re: Christian Womack
as 20-3011
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK
In re: Christian Womack
as 19-3877
Not Yet Classified:
In re: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK, a/k/a Gucci Prada, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG
Christian WomackIn re: Christian Womack
as 19-2677
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG and In re: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK
Virgillo Vargas v. Mitchell Goldberg, et al
as 19-2367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGILLO VARGAS
Defendant:
M. FAITH ANGELL, LYNNE A. SITARSKI, MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG and others
In re: Lewis Jordan
as 19-9001
Not Yet Classified:
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
